> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 2:49 PM > To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r675044 - in /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x: > include/rw/_tuple.h include/tuple > tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp > tests/utilities/20.tuple.creation.cpp > tests/utilities/20.tuple.h tests/utilities/20.tuple.helpers.cpp > > Eric Lemings wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:10 AM > >> To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r675044 - in /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x: > >> include/rw/_tuple.h include/tuple > >> tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp > >> tests/utilities/20.tuple.creation.cpp > >> tests/utilities/20.tuple.h tests/utilities/20.tuple.helpers.cpp > >> > > ... > >>> I think the commented out parameter name should be removed. > >> I don't see > >>> this in existing code, and I personally find it a bit distracting. > >> I agree. Without a name, it's obvious that the parameter > >> is unused. > > > > Examples in existing code: > > As I said before, you can find examples of pretty much any > style, including two space indents. Are you purposely seeking > out these rare, obscure cases and adopting them in your code > just to make things interesting?
Actually no, if you believe that. Was just providing examples since Travis could find no such usage in existing code. Brad.
