> -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Lemings > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 3:14 PM > To: 'dev@stdcxx.apache.org' > Subject: RE: svn commit: r675044 - in /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x: > include/rw/_tuple.h include/tuple > tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp > tests/utilities/20.tuple.creation.cpp > tests/utilities/20.tuple.h tests/utilities/20.tuple.helpers.cpp > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:10 AM > > To: dev@stdcxx.apache.org > > Subject: Re: svn commit: r675044 - in /stdcxx/branches/4.3.x: > > include/rw/_tuple.h include/tuple > > tests/utilities/20.tuple.cnstr.cpp > > tests/utilities/20.tuple.creation.cpp > > tests/utilities/20.tuple.h tests/utilities/20.tuple.helpers.cpp > > > ... > > > This can probably be changed to use a void return type, which will > > > simplify the code further. You only really need the return > > type to chain > > > assignments or to call a function on the result, none of > > which we should > > > be doing. > > > > Good idea! Also, the inline specifier is redundant and should > > be removed. > > A void return type causes an compile error:
Duh. Disregard.
