On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Liviu Nicoara <nikko...@hates.ms> wrote: > On 08/29/12 10:54, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> Looking over the lack of activity within this project, it's >> obvious (at least to me), that maybe its day is done. >> >> Should I call a vote to move C++ to the Attic? Or is there someone >> who feels that the project should still exist *and* is willing >> to stand as chair? > > > Hi Jim, > > The discussion back in February showed that, even though committers have not > spent much time lately contributing new code to it, there is an active > review of the activity occurring on the mailing list and people have > volunteered time to at least review outside contributions. As Stefan > remarked, putting it in the Attic pretty much closes the activity around it, > as little as it is. > > I personally have a renewed interest in the implementation and am in the > process of reviving my apache account with the intention of being a constant > presence here, and I hope I will be able to contribute as well. I am not > sure if anyone reviewed the patches volunteered by Stefan yet, or the > changes in forks elsewhere, but I am currently looking at that, too. > > Thanks. > > Liviu
I've been quiet lately for reasons completely unrelated to my interest in stdcxx. I'm still just as interested as I was before. I've also developed a new interest in getting stdcxx to compile with clang 3.1 - it currently doesn't. Perhaps we could also start discussing C++2011 - at a convenient pace, since only clang currently supports it. 0.02. --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. stefan.tele...@gmail.com
