On Aug 31, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Wojciech Meyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> writes: > >> So how are/were they committers?? > > Hi! > > Chime in - I think we need to clarify what kind of problems we have with > stdcxx being hosted as an Apache project. > > The two significant ones (as far as I can understand): > > - as I heard from Christopher Bergström that it's hard to push the > stdcxx to FreeBSD ports repository (I can understand it and that > sounds pretty bad, if that's the case then the board should consider > re-licensing as advised; I agree in general it's a hard decision for > the board, but imagine the project would benefit, IANAL tho) Not exactly sure why, or how, since there are other ASF projects in the FreeBSD ports directory... LOTS of others. > > So what we need to submit from everybody (not trying to be bossy this > time :-)) > 1) list of *real* impediments, concrete examples: so we can workout the > plan. Bullet points would be great, similar to facts table Christopher > has submitted. > 2) list of our commitments vs. stdcxx: who is going to do what in the > meantime. > > #1: Nothing comes to my mind right now, apart from not putting into > attic for time being please, but I understand other people might have a > lot of to say. > > #2: I plan to commit my patches to armcc port of stdcxx in the short > time, and perhaps help with the Clang port as somebody already have > mentioned, this certainly needs to be discussed! ++1 !! Thx!!!
