On 09/ 1/12 01:35 AM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:27 PM, "C. Bergström"
<[email protected]> wrote:
stdcxx ends up linking against *EVERY* C++ application if it's used in the
default compiler setup. (Which is what I was trying to achieve) That
includes *******GPLv2******** software in ports. Get it?
How exactly is APLv2 different from 2-clause BSD or 3-clause BSD in
this respect? The BSD licenses are just as incompatible with GPLv2 as
APLv2 is.
Our views may be the same, but others are not
from the apache website
"Despite our best efforts, the FSF has never considered the Apache
License to be compatible with GPL version 2"
http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
