Of the three blockers:

STORM-1141 looks invalid now that 0.10.0 has been released.
STORM-930 also looks invalid, and there aren’t many details to diagnose.
STORM-617 doesn’t seem like a blocker, since there is a workaround for the 
issue.

I will look through JIRA and open pull requests to see if there are any other 
issues we should be tracking for the 1.0 release.

For me, STORM-1406 would be nice to have, but I don’t see it in any way a 
blocker for the 1.0 release. The only thing I have to complete before opening a 
pull request is documentation and sample usage. Again, I’m fine if it doesn’t 
make it into 1.0.

-Taylor


> On Jan 4, 2016, at 12:33 PM, Bobby Evans <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I feel we are about ready to do a 1.0 release.
> The only JIRA left on the list 
> (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STORM/Storm+Release+1.0) is 
> STORM-1371.  I would also like to see STORM-1202 go in.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20STORM%20and%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20and%20priority%20%3E%3D%20Blocker
> only shows 3 blockers.  we should review them, but they don't look like real 
> blockers to me.
> Are we missing anything?  If not as soon as STORM-1371 and STORM-1202 I will 
> create a 1.0 branch and we can start work on stabilizing 1.0 enough to 
> release, and in parallel start the JStorm migration work.
>  - Bobby

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to