I agree that it has stabilized a lot recently.
Taylor, in the past you have been the one that has done most of the release
work. I am fine with letting you continue that for the 1.x line if you like,
or I am happy to do some of that too if you would rather off load it. Please
let me know what you prefer.
Thanks,
Bobby
On Tuesday, February 2, 2016 8:07 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]>
wrote:
Done. Thanks for the suggestion.
-Taylor
> On Feb 2, 2016, at 5:11 AM, Abhishek Agarwal <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Is it possible to make the type as Epic so that remaining filed issues can
> be directly linked?
> e.g. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1455
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:53 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think the 1.x-branch has stabilized enough that it’s safe to allow the
>> master branch diverge in support of the JStorm merge. There’s a lot of
>> good work going on with the JStorm merge, and I’d like to unblock that.
>>
>> I created STORM-1491 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1491> for
>> tracking any remaining items for the 1.0 release, and would propose that
>> any remaining/new items for 1.0 be added as a subtask to that JIRA. When
>> all are complete/punted/etc. we move forward with a release.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> -Taylor
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Abhishek Agarwal
