Should back porting fixes from master to 1.0 be included as tasks under that 
epic?

From: "P. Taylor Goetz" <ptgo...@gmail.com<mailto:ptgo...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: <dev@storm.apache.org<mailto:dev@storm.apache.org>>
Date: Monday, February 1, 2016 at 7:23 PM
To: <dev@storm.apache.org<mailto:dev@storm.apache.org>>
Subject: [DISCUSS] 1.0 Release/Clojure-Java Migration

I think the 1.x-branch has stabilized enough that it's safe to allow the master 
branch diverge in support of the JStorm merge.  There's a lot of good work 
going on with the JStorm merge, and I'd like to unblock that.

I created STORM-1491<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1491> for 
tracking any remaining items for the 1.0 release, and would propose that any 
remaining/new items for 1.0 be added as a subtask to that JIRA. When all are 
complete/punted/etc. we move forward with a release.

Any thoughts?

-Taylor

Reply via email to