[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15399186#comment-15399186
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-2006:
---------------------------------------

Github user abhishekagarwal87 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1595#discussion_r72779215
  
    --- Diff: storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/daemon/StormCommon.java ---
    @@ -436,7 +414,9 @@ public static void addMetricComponents(Map conf, 
StormTopology topology) {
         public static void addSystemComponents(Map conf, StormTopology 
topology) {
             Map<String, StreamInfo> outputStreams = new HashMap<String, 
StreamInfo>();
             outputStreams.put(Constants.SYSTEM_TICK_STREAM_ID, 
Thrift.outputFields(Arrays.asList("rate_secs")));
    +        outputStreams.put(Constants.METRICS_STREAM_ID, 
Thrift.directOutputFields(Arrays.asList("task-info", "data-points")));
    --- End diff --
    
    is it needed?


> Storm metrics feature improvement: support per-worker level metrics 
> aggregation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-2006
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2006
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: storm-core
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Jungtaek Lim
>            Assignee: Jungtaek Lim
>
> Storm provides per-task level metrics which could be huge when topology has a 
> number of tasks. 
> Task level metric is useful for determining load balance between tasks, but 
> it doesn't need to be time-series fashion.
> Before introducing topology level component like TopologyMaster for JStorm, 
> we can utilize SystemBolt to aggregate task level metrics to per-worker level 
> metrics.
> We should provide options and this feature should be turned off by default to 
> keep backward compatibility. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to