Github user arunmahadevan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2241#discussion_r129479581
--- Diff:
storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/daemon/worker/WorkerState.java ---
@@ -488,84 +476,55 @@ public void registerCallbacks() {
LOG.info("Registering IConnectionCallbacks for {}:{}",
assignmentId, port);
receiver.registerRecv(new
DeserializingConnectionCallback(topologyConf,
getWorkerTopologyContext(),
- this::transferLocal));
+ this::transferLocalBatch));
}
- public void transferLocal(List<AddressedTuple> tupleBatch) {
- Map<Integer, List<AddressedTuple>> grouped = new HashMap<>();
- for (AddressedTuple tuple : tupleBatch) {
- Integer executor = taskToShortExecutor.get(tuple.dest);
- if (null == executor) {
- LOG.warn("Received invalid messages for unknown tasks.
Dropping... ");
- continue;
- }
- List<AddressedTuple> current = grouped.get(executor);
- if (null == current) {
- current = new ArrayList<>();
- grouped.put(executor, current);
- }
- current.add(tuple);
- }
- for (Map.Entry<Integer, List<AddressedTuple>> entry :
grouped.entrySet()) {
- DisruptorQueue queue =
shortExecutorReceiveQueueMap.get(entry.getKey());
- if (null != queue) {
- queue.publish(entry.getValue());
- } else {
- LOG.warn("Received invalid messages for unknown tasks.
Dropping... ");
+ private void transferLocalBatch(List<AddressedTuple> tupleBatch) {
+ try {
+ for (int i = 0; i < tupleBatch.size(); i++) {
--- End diff --
For non random access lists the perf will get worse. So change the
signature `transferLocalBatch` to accept `ArrayList<AddressedTuple>`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
