> What is the value in keeping the associated Jira issues around though?

1) I had thought Jira issues could be valid even if they are stale, whereas
pull requests typically are not valid when they go stale.
2) It is less effort. :)

The simplest thing to do would be to run a similar query (not updated in
2018) and close the issues with a common message.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-579?jql=project%20%3D%20STORM%20AND%20statusCategory%20!%3D%20done%20AND%20updatedDate%20%3C%20startOfYear()%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20ASC

It seems there are currently 800+ issues that match. That is an awful lot.
I would be open to handling these in bulk too if that is what we want.


On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:19 PM Hugo Louro <[email protected]> wrote:

> Derek, I am OK with closing them all. By phase I meant perhaps leaving some
> of the most recent one's in case the author wants to resume them... but I
> guess he can always reopen them.
> Stig, the JIRAs I think the should be handled on an individual basis. If
> they are still revenant, leave the JIRA open hoping someone will pick it
> up. If they are no longer relevant, perhaps close as "will not fix" or
> something like that.
>
> Hugo
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:12 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> [email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 to close old PRs.
> >
> > What is the value in keeping the associated Jira issues around though?
> >
> > Den tir. 9. okt. 2018 kl. 17.18 skrev Derek Dagit
> <[email protected]
> > >:
> >
> > > > Is the idea to remove them all in one batch, or have the removal
> > process
> > > through phases ?
> > >
> > > Yeah, the idea was to close them all in one batch. We do not want to
> > close
> > > pull requests that have value, and we want to balance this with the
> > effort
> > > required to review each one to see if it instead should be kept open.
> > >
> > > If we are interested in putting in more effort, then we could remove in
> > > phases.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 5:30 PM Hugo Louro <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 to remove old PRs. If any PRs still warrant any value we could try
> > > > reaching out to the creator to see if he wants to follow up with it.
> Is
> > > the
> > > > idea to remove them all in one batch, or have the removal process
> > through
> > > > phases ?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 3:26 PM Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 It doesn't look like there're any critical PRs in the list, and
> it
> > > is
> > > > > pretty less chance we could connect with PR authors.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018년 10월 9일 (화) 오전 5:08, Kishorkumar Patil
> <[email protected]
> > > >님이
> > > > > 작성:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1.
> > > > > > It would be nice to clean up old clutter while we are getting
> ready
> > > for
> > > > > > days past 2.x
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Kishor
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 3:52 PM Bobby Evans <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sounds good to me
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 2:50 PM Derek Dagit
> > <[email protected]
> > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Currently there are over 150 open pull requests on the Apache
> > > Storm
> > > > > > > GitHub
> > > > > > > > project. Over 100 of these have not been modified in 2018.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It seems we are unlikely to handle each one of these without
> > > > > > significant
> > > > > > > > effort and time. Looking at many of them, they seem to be
> > > abandoned
> > > > > by
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > requester.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I propose in STORM-3250 that we close all pull requests that
> > have
> > > > not
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > updated in 2018 and leave any corresponding Jira issues as
> they
> > > > are.
> > > > > If
> > > > > > > > there are any pull requests among these should remain open,
> > > please
> > > > > let
> > > > > > me
> > > > > > > > know. I plan to wait at least a week before requesting any
> > > changes.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+updated%3A%3C2018-01-01
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Derek
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Derek
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Derek

Reply via email to