Hi all, can anyone have a look please?
It blocks running Storm on Java 17. Build passes (but requires the changes from https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3437 to fix the CI environment) Gruß Richard Am Mittwoch, dem 12.01.2022 um 16:18 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla: > Hi all, > > I have created a pull request to upgrade Zookeeper to 3.5.9, which > fixes STORM-3817: > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3431 > > If someone can have a look and merge this one, I would be very happy. > > In addition, I was thinking about an upgrade to 3.6.x or 3.7.x but > "curator-4.3.0" depends on 3.5.x - this lead to some weird behaviour > in the unit tests. Guess it is related to a incompatible curator / > zookeeper combination 4.3.x vs. 3.7.x (3.6.x) combination. > > Upgrading curator to 5.x breaks exhibitor support and I don't know, > if > this is a commonly used and required feature. Therefore, I stick to > zookeeper 3.5.9 as this fixes the problem reported in STORM-3817. > > As a newbie to Storm dev, I had some issues in setting up and running > the build in an Ubuntu 20.04 desktop environment. Documentation is a > bit outdated / tricky in this regard. If appreciated, I could > contribute some documentation enhancements to get it back up on > track. > > In the end I relied on an Ubuntu 16.04 server VM and used the build > scripts targeting Travis CI to conduct a full build and to get some > feedback on my changes. Build passed. It also passes for the Travis > CI: https://github.com/apache/storm/runs/4790137021 > > Gruß > Richard > > > > Am Montag, dem 10.01.2022 um 18:47 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla: > > Hi all, > > > > I am new to the Storm community habits and might miss context / > > information, so execuse my question: > > > > Are there any strict objections to upgrade zookeeper from 3.4.14 to > > 3.6.x or 3.6.x as proposed in STORM-3817 [1]? > > > > Specifically I am running into [2] running a storm cluster (in a > > docker-based setup) with Java 17. > > > > I saw, that there was a PR a while ago [3], which was never merged. > > > > If there are no strict objections (as I am new to the Storm > > community > > habits and might miss context / information ;-)), I could probably > > give > > it a try and provide a PR. > > > > Happy to get some feedback! > > > > Gruß > > Richard > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3817 > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3779 > > [3] https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3017 > > > >