Hi all,

can anyone have a look please? 

It blocks running Storm on Java 17.

Build passes (but requires the changes from 
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3437 to fix the CI environment)

Gruß
Richard

Am Mittwoch, dem 12.01.2022 um 16:18 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have created a pull request to upgrade Zookeeper to 3.5.9, which
> fixes STORM-3817:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3431
> 
> If someone can have a look and merge this one, I would be very happy.
> 
> In addition, I was thinking about an upgrade to 3.6.x or 3.7.x but
> "curator-4.3.0" depends on 3.5.x - this lead to some weird behaviour
> in the unit tests. Guess it is related to a incompatible curator /
> zookeeper combination 4.3.x vs. 3.7.x (3.6.x) combination.
> 
> Upgrading curator to 5.x breaks exhibitor support and I don't know,
> if
> this is a commonly used and required feature. Therefore, I stick to
> zookeeper 3.5.9 as this fixes the problem reported in STORM-3817.
> 
> As a newbie to Storm dev, I had some issues in setting up and running
> the build in an Ubuntu 20.04 desktop environment. Documentation is a
> bit outdated / tricky in this regard. If appreciated, I could
> contribute some documentation enhancements to get it back up on
> track.
> 
> In the end I relied on an Ubuntu 16.04 server VM and used the build
> scripts targeting Travis CI to conduct a full build and to get some
> feedback on my changes. Build passed. It also passes for the Travis
> CI: https://github.com/apache/storm/runs/4790137021
> 
> Gruß
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> Am Montag, dem 10.01.2022 um 18:47 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I am new to the Storm community habits and might miss context /
> > information, so execuse my question:
> > 
> > Are there any strict objections to upgrade zookeeper from 3.4.14 to
> > 3.6.x or 3.6.x as proposed in STORM-3817 [1]?
> > 
> > Specifically I am running into [2] running a storm cluster (in a
> > docker-based setup) with Java 17. 
> > 
> > I saw, that there was a PR a while ago [3], which was never merged.
> > 
> > If there are no strict objections (as I am new to the Storm
> > community
> > habits and might miss context / information ;-)), I could probably
> > give
> > it a try and provide a PR.
> > 
> > Happy to get some feedback!
> > 
> > Gruß
> > Richard
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3817
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3779
> > [3] https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3017
> > 
> > 

Reply via email to