Hi Thanks Richard. There are some dubious votes indeed.
My views is that we could keep only the modules with 4 votes or more : cassandra, elasticsearch, hdfs-*, jms, kafka*, metrics, redis The rest can be removed. If people feel strongly about them, they can always copy the code and maintain it in external repos (which can of course be contributed back later on if they prove to be popular). Given the low number of active committers on the project, any reduction on the size of the code or number of dependencies to maintain is a good thing. Julien On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 at 07:04, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > our survey is closed and here are the results. We only have a sample > size of n=11, which isn't great but somehow represents the current > state of Storm (just revived from the Attic). > > You find the results here: [1] (csv + image). User comments are also > added to the gist. > > We had some votes from people, who aren't using Storm at the moment and > just need a technical comparison between Storm, Flink and Spark to > decide, which one to use. Therefore, it seems, that they marked every > module as "must have" ;-) - as a take-a-way: it might be good to > provide such comparison on our website. > > We should discuss, which modules are worth being kept in the main > repository and which modules can be extracted (for example into a > "storm-external" repository). > > Due to the tight coupling for security (in the UI), we need to keep the > hadoop-related stuff. Kafka things are also a thing, it seems. > > Some of the moduels are used by (new) PMC members, so they might have > the energy to start an update initiative on these modules. > > Happy to hear your thoughts! > > Gruß > Richard > > > > [1] https://gist.github.com/rzo1/2a1d20acfc20da050ea515770c6606df > -- *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering* http://www.digitalpebble.com http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
