On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2. Close the nathanmarz/storm repo on github and direct people to > > git://git.apache.org/incubator-storm.git (I’ve been keeping the github > > and apache repos in sync). > > > > Another option here is to simply reverse the direction of the pull here and > leave nathanmarz/storm in place, but make it be an echo of the apache git. > > That allows less disruption to existing users. > Keep in mind that Apache automatically mirrors git repos to GitHub under the Apache group (Apache/Storm) > > > > > 3. Get an answer on whether we can continue to use 0mq as a dependency > > given it’s LGPL license. And if so, what are the implications for > > source-only and binary releases. > > > > LGPL is a bit of a problem even if allowed. > > Note that depending on a modified version of 0mq that is distributed by the > same group is even more problematic. > +1. > > Has something like netty been considered? >
