On Dec 11, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales <[email protected]> wrote:
> 3. Get an answer on whether we can continue to use 0mq as a dependency >> given it’s LGPL license. And if so, what are the implications for >> source-only and binary releases. >> > > There has been some discussion around this issue. See, e.g., > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200508.mbox/%[email protected]%3e Our solution for 0mq is to move that code out to a separate, non-Apache project. If users want to use the 0mq transport they can download/build it and install it themselves. > > 5. Figure out what to do with Thrift. Right now we’re using a forked >> version with packages renamed to avoid conflicts, which I could potentially >> cause problems with releasing under Apache. One potential fix would be to >> use a stock Thrift version and repackage it using jarjar. > > > Would solving the more general class loader issue also solve this specific > issue? > https://github.com/nathanmarz/storm/issues/115 Yes it would. But solving that issue is easier said than done. We’re currently exploring the use of jarjar to repackage it until a time when #115 can be properly addressed. - Taylor
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
