Hi Martin,

While i was working on Application update, i fixed few issues with the
termination behavior. Anyway there seems to be small issues in the logic
which has to be fixed. I have started to verify this in my local setup. Can
you create a jira? So that we can track it. I will update the progress in
the jira..

Thanks,
Reka

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) <mep...@cisco.com>
wrote:

>  Hi Reka,
>
>
>
> Thanks for following up - let me know if I should open a JIRA,
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> *From:* Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 28, 2015 5:37 AM
> *To:* dev
> *Subject:* Re: Testing Stratos 4.1 : nested grouping scenario with
> startup and termination issues (?)
>
>
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up. I have fixed some issue in the flow while
> testing application update support with instances count. I will go through
> your scenarios to reproduce it and update the thread with the progress..
>
> Thanks,
>
> Reka
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) <mep...@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> I am testing a (nested grouping) scenario where a group defines a
> termination behavior “terminate-all”. When terminating the instance (of
> cartridge type c3), no new instance is restarted.
>
> My understanding is that a new instance should be started up.
>
>
>
> The scenario looks like this:
>
>
>
> Group ~G1 has a cartridge member c1 and group member ~G2
>
> Group ~G2 has a cartridge member c2 and group member ~G3
>
> Group ~G3 has a cartridge member c3
>
>
>
> Startup dependencies are: c1 depends on G2, c2 depends on G3
>
>
>
> ~G1 defines termination: none
>
> ~G2 defines termination: dependents
>
> ~G3 defines termination: all
>
>
>
> After startup, when all instances are active, instance c3 is terminated
> which correctly also terminates also instance c2 (since it depends on G3 /
> c3) .
>
> *Issue 1:*
>
> However, no new instances for c3 is started up (consequently no new
> instance for c2 should be started up as well) (see log see log
> wso2carbon.log)
>
>
>
> Only instance which remains running is c1.
>
> *Issue 2:*
>
> When subsequently c1 is manually being terminated, a new instance of c1 is
> started up (as opposed to Issue1) which I think is incorrect since it
> defines a startup dependency (c1 depends on G2) which is not fulfilled at
> the time (G2 should not be active since c2 is still terminated, see log
> wso2carbon-issue2.log, same log as wso2carbon.log but at a later time)
>
>
>
> WDYT ?
>
>
>
> Please find attached artifacts and logs
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Reka Thirunavukkarasu
> Senior Software Engineer,
> WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
>
> Mobile: +94776442007
>
>
>



-- 
Reka Thirunavukkarasu
Senior Software Engineer,
WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com,
Mobile: +94776442007

Reply via email to