HI Martin, Can you please confirm whether you are using unique applicationId and group alias? I can see from the UI, the applicationID and next group alias are same value as sub-G1-G2-G3-1..
Thanks, Reka On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) <mep...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Reka, > > > > I have upgraded from beta to the latest stratos code on master and > retested the scenario from jira STRATOS-1345 but still see the same issue > (on open stack) > > > > Thanks > > > > Martin > > > > > > *From:* Martin Eppel (meppel) > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 2:54 PM > *To:* dev@stratos.apache.org > *Subject:* RE: Testing Stratos 4.1 : nested grouping scenario with > startup and termination issues (?) > > > > Hi Reka, > > > > I will upgrade my system to the latest master and re-test, > > > > Regards > > > > Martin > > > > *From:* Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com <r...@wso2.com>] > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:55 AM > *To:* dev > *Subject:* Re: Testing Stratos 4.1 : nested grouping scenario with > startup and termination issues (?) > > > > Hi Martin, > > While i was working on Application update, i fixed few issues with the > termination behavior. Anyway there seems to be small issues in the logic > which has to be fixed. I have started to verify this in my local setup. Can > you create a jira? So that we can track it. I will update the progress in > the jira.. > > Thanks, > > Reka > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) <mep...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > Hi Reka, > > > > Thanks for following up - let me know if I should open a JIRA, > > > > Thanks > > > > Martin > > > > *From:* Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 28, 2015 5:37 AM > *To:* dev > *Subject:* Re: Testing Stratos 4.1 : nested grouping scenario with > startup and termination issues (?) > > > > Hi Martin, > > Thanks for bringing this up. I have fixed some issue in the flow while > testing application update support with instances count. I will go through > your scenarios to reproduce it and update the thread with the progress.. > > Thanks, > > Reka > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) <mep...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > I am testing a (nested grouping) scenario where a group defines a > termination behavior “terminate-all”. When terminating the instance (of > cartridge type c3), no new instance is restarted. > > My understanding is that a new instance should be started up. > > > > The scenario looks like this: > > > > Group ~G1 has a cartridge member c1 and group member ~G2 > > Group ~G2 has a cartridge member c2 and group member ~G3 > > Group ~G3 has a cartridge member c3 > > > > Startup dependencies are: c1 depends on G2, c2 depends on G3 > > > > ~G1 defines termination: none > > ~G2 defines termination: dependents > > ~G3 defines termination: all > > > > After startup, when all instances are active, instance c3 is terminated > which correctly also terminates also instance c2 (since it depends on G3 / > c3) . > > *Issue 1:* > > However, no new instances for c3 is started up (consequently no new > instance for c2 should be started up as well) (see log see log > wso2carbon.log) > > > > Only instance which remains running is c1. > > *Issue 2:* > > When subsequently c1 is manually being terminated, a new instance of c1 is > started up (as opposed to Issue1) which I think is incorrect since it > defines a startup dependency (c1 depends on G2) which is not fulfilled at > the time (G2 should not be active since c2 is still terminated, see log > wso2carbon-issue2.log, same log as wso2carbon.log but at a later time) > > > > WDYT ? > > > > Please find attached artifacts and logs > > > > Thanks > > > > Martin > > > > > -- > > Reka Thirunavukkarasu > Senior Software Engineer, > WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com, > > Mobile: +94776442007 > > > > > > > -- > > Reka Thirunavukkarasu > Senior Software Engineer, > WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com, > > Mobile: +94776442007 > > > -- Reka Thirunavukkarasu Senior Software Engineer, WSO2, Inc.:http://wso2.com, Mobile: +94776442007
