On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Swapnil Patil <swapnil.r...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Isuru,
>
> Thanks for suggesstions.
>
>
>> Member class is used in the Topology hierarchy, to represent each member
>> of a cluster. For me, the easiest way to find where it has been referenced
>> is using the IDE that you are using. For an example, in IntelliJ Idea, you
>> can right click on the Member class's constructor -> click on find usages.
>> I'm sure you know this already.
>>
>
> Yes, I am aware of it. Currently I am using Eclipse. The thing is, I am
> new to Maven projects. I have imported all the projects in the workspace.
> But I am not able to find references to this class. I am getting the error
> "The resource is not on the build path of a Java project". To fix this I
> need to configure the build path. But unfortunately, the option to
> configure build path is disabled. Now I am not sure why is this so. This
> option to configure build path is enabled for a few projects (which I
> assume Eclipse treat them as Java project) but for others (many of them) it
> is disabled (I assume Eclipse doesn't treat them as Java projects).
>
> I am not sure about this behaviour. Is this because I have imported Maven
> projects? Is there anything else I need to do? like creating Eclipse
> projects manually with command 'maven eclipse:eclipse'?
>
Yes, mvn eclipse:eclipse should create the eclipse project for you. Then,
open the project from the Eclipse IDE. It should work.

>
>
>
>> IMO If this instance id is an optional field, its fine to use a setter.
>> If its a mandatory field for all Member objects, the it should be
>> initialized in the same constructor that is there currently.
>>
>
> Okay. Thanks. I think this new field should be optional.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Swapnil
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Swapnil Patil <swapnil.r...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Devs,
>>>
>>> I am adding a new field
>>> in org.apache.stratos.messaging.domain.topology.Member class, called
>>> instanceId.
>>>
>>> For this, what would be a better approach
>>>
>>> 1. Modifying the existing constructor
>>> 2. Adding a new constructor which takes this as an additional argument
>>> 3. Just have a setter method.
>>>
>>> In case of 2 and 3, the member may not be initialized properly.
>>>
>>> I am confused about which to use because I am unaware of the scope of
>>> this Member class. If this is widely used then option 1 would mean changes
>>> at a lot of places.
>>>
>>> If I know what is the scope of this Member class, it would help me
>>> determine which approach to follow. Is there any way to find out in what
>>> all places a class's object is used apart from searching it manually
>>> through the codebase?
>>>
>>> I would appreciate any help in deciding the approach.
>>>
>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>> Swapnil
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>
>>> Isuru H.
>>> +94 716 358 048
>>>
>>> --
>>> <%2B94%20716%20358%20048>
>>> <%2B94%20716%20358%20048>
>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>
>>> Isuru H.
>>> <%2B94%20716%20358%20048>
>>> +94 716 358 048* <http://wso2.com/>*
>>>
>>>
>>> * <http://wso2.com/>*
>>>
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to