On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Lahiru Sandaruwan <lahi...@wso2.com>
wrote:

> Hi Raj,
>
> Yes. A good point. I didn't carefully analysed the test cases. But I guess
> the problem is that we have automated the samples as test cases, where all
> the samples do basic stuff again and again.
>
> No, now we have proper test cases which use artifacts packaged in unit
test resources folder.

@Raj: +1 to remove duplicated test scenarios.

Thanks


> I think the solution should be a master test plan, building a story to
> start with the simple use-case, and grow that to cover all the use cases,
> with the same artifacts(with maximum re-usability).
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Rajkumar Rajaratnam <rajkum...@wso2.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Devs,
>>
>> We don't need to test the same test scenarios in different test cases.
>> For example, "testing whether any used policies can be removed or not"
>> ​should be tested only in one test case. But we are doing this check in
>> couple of test cases. This is an unnecessary delay in running integration
>> tests.
>>
>> ​IMO,
>>
>> - we need to test a scenario only in one test case
>> - we need to have an order for test cases (class level) to make sure that
>> certain scenarios will be executed in an order. For example, policy level
>> tests should be executed before application level tests.
>>
>> It will significantly reduce the time taken for the integration tests.
>> wdyt?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raj.
>> ​
>>
>> --
>> Rajkumar Rajaratnam
>> Committer & PMC Member, Apache Stratos
>> Software Engineer, WSO2
>>
>> Mobile : +94777568639
>> ​​
>>
>> Blog : rajkumarr.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Lahiru Sandaruwan
> Committer and PMC member, Apache Stratos,
> Senior Software Engineer,
> WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com
> lean.enterprise.middleware
>
> phone: +94773325954
> email: lahi...@wso2.com blog: http://lahiruwrites.blogspot.com/
> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/lahiru-sandaruwan/16/153/146
>
>


-- 
Imesh Gunaratne

Senior Technical Lead, WSO2
Committer & PMC Member, Apache Stratos

Reply via email to