On 5/2/14, 1:44 AM, Lakmal Warusawithana wrote:
Yes, I agree with Vanson on this. We should not mandate puppet. Later
someone may wants to use cheft.

+1 for maintain separate templates.

@Vanson, if you guys testing with scripting method please send upstream
your contributions.

Yes, will do, Working with Jeffrey on this and we'll send our changes upstream, for the near term, we'll get the diffs to fix up the existing jndi.properties.template and stratos.sh so that cartridge agent works by default without having to change these files.

-Vanson

thanks


On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Vanson Lim <[email protected]> wrote:

  I am not sure I agree with requiring the use of puppet to configure
everything as it's not always practical to install puppet into a cartridge
image.  There's also the issue where depending on the VM you are trying to
convert into a cartridge might make use of a different versions of puppet.

I'd like to see the cartridge agent packaged to be deploy-able as a
standalone entity and then to value add with puppet for those use cases
that support it.

I would prefer having the templates reside in a central templates
directory,  provide an option during setup to deploy it into the puppet
modules/template directory tree.

This avoids the issue of having two versions of the template, one for
puppet and one for non puppet deployment cases.

For those who don't want to use puppet, they can minimally script up
something which transforms the source templates.

Right now, we've found a few files like the cartridge-agent/bin/stratos.sh
and the cartridge-agent/conf/template/jndi.properties.template to be
incompatible with the latest code behavior.

the stratos.sh. is missing recently added APP_PATH property and works only
if you use puppet to overwrite file that is shipped in the zip.

Similarly, the jndi/properties.template file by default doesn't have
configuration which run's with activemq, even though all the documentation
points to it.  We found in RC1 the JNDI template needs the following
changes otherwise the cartridge agent will fail to connect with apache
stratos.

Original:

connectionfactoryName=topicConnectionfactory
connectionfactory.topicConnectionfactory=amqp://admin:admin@carbon
/carbon?brokerlist='tcp://$mb_ip:$mb_port'

java.naming.factory.initial=org.wso2.andes.jndi.PropertiesFileInitialContextFactory



Actual values required for ActiveMQ:

connectionfactoryName=TopicConnectionFactory
connectionfactory.topicConnectionfactory=tcp://$mb_ip:$mb_port

java.naming.factory.initial=org.apache.activemq.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory


-Vanson



On 5/1/14, 8:49 AM, Isuru Haththotuwa wrote:

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Akila Ravihansa Perera<[email protected]> 
<[email protected]>wrote:


  Hi,

Cartridge Agent currently uses a JndiConfigurator class to modify the
jndi.properties file to set MB IP and MB port. It uses a
jndi.properties.template file to generate this. But according to
Stratos 4.0 architecture all the properties files should be generated
from the Puppet scripts.

IMO, this templating logic should be removed from the Cartridge
Agent's end and should be done via Puppet scripts. If the community
agrees to that I could work on a patch for this. WDYT?


  +1


  Thanks.

--
Akila Ravihansa Perera
Software Engineer
WSO2 Inc.http://wso2.com

Phone: +94 77 64 154 38
Blog: http://ravihansa3000.blogspot.com






Reply via email to