Dear Caican Cai, Thank you for reaching out and sharing your thoughts on the specifications for future community merge PR. I appreciate your dedication to maintaining the standards within the Streampark community.
I understand your suggestion to introduce a measure of waiting for a day before PMC or the submitter approves the PR and merges it. However, I have a concern about whether this might reduce the enthusiasm of individuals willing to submit PRs. I'm curious to know if other Apache communities operate in a similar manner or if there are alternative approaches that have been successful in maintaining standards while also encouraging active participation. I believe that it's important to strike a balance between standardization and maintaining an environment that fosters active contribution from community members. Thank you for considering these points, and I look forward to further discussion on this matter. Best regards, Chao A (VampireAchao) caican cai <[email protected]> 于2024年1月14日周日 23:07写道： > Dear StreamPark: > Hello everyone, regarding the title specification of streampark's pr. Based > on the last discussion, it can currently be controlled by the committer and > pmc, but it must be regulated according to the standards of the community's > official website. I think a measure can be added, which is to wait a day > after a pmc or committer approves a PR before merging it, and see what > else Does > the committer or PMC have any other opinions? This is the approach of the > Calcite community. I believe this can improve the standardization of the > community. For example, I check the progress of each PR and the > standardization of the PR title in the Streampark community every day. > > Best regards > Cancai Cai > > link： > > https://streampark.apache.org/community/submit_guide/code_style_and_quality_guide/ >
