Dear Cancai Cai, Thank you for your dedication to reviewing PR progress and proposing the waiting period idea. I greatly appreciate your efforts in striking a balance between maintaining high standards and encouraging active community participation. It is indeed crucial to find a harmonious balance that facilitates productive collaboration while upholding the quality of contributions.
I want to express my strong agreement with your proposal. Implementing a structured waiting period seems like a thoughtful approach to ensure both fairness and efficiency in the review process. This initiative could positively impact the workflow and foster a more engaging and responsive community environment. Best regards, Chao A (VampireAchao) Cancai Cai <[email protected]> 于2024年1月14日周日 23:37写道： > Dear a chao, > I understand your concerns, and I think we can add a comment like this > after approval: LGTM. If no one else has other opinions, I will merge this > PR tomorrow. I believe this is acceptable to many developers > > Best wish, > Cancai Cai > > chao a <[email protected]> 于2024年1月14日周日 23:25写道： > > > Dear Caican Cai, > > > > Thank you for reaching out and sharing your thoughts on the > specifications > > for future community merge PR. I appreciate your dedication to > maintaining > > the standards within the Streampark community. > > > > I understand your suggestion to introduce a measure of waiting for a day > > before PMC or the submitter approves the PR and merges it. However, I > have > > a concern about whether this might reduce the enthusiasm of individuals > > willing to submit PRs. I'm curious to know if other Apache communities > > operate in a similar manner or if there are alternative approaches that > > have been successful in maintaining standards while also encouraging > active > > participation. > > > > I believe that it's important to strike a balance between standardization > > and maintaining an environment that fosters active contribution from > > community members. > > > > Thank you for considering these points, and I look forward to further > > discussion on this matter. > > > > Best regards, > > Chao A (VampireAchao) > > > > caican cai <[email protected]> 于2024年1月14日周日 23:07写道： > > > > > Dear StreamPark: > > > Hello everyone, regarding the title specification of streampark's pr. > > Based > > > on the last discussion, it can currently be controlled by the committer > > and > > > pmc, but it must be regulated according to the standards of the > > community's > > > official website. I think a measure can be added, which is to wait a > day > > > after a pmc or committer approves a PR before merging it, and see what > > > else Does > > > the committer or PMC have any other opinions? This is the approach of > the > > > Calcite community. I believe this can improve the standardization of > the > > > community. For example, I check the progress of each PR and the > > > standardization of the PR title in the Streampark community every day. > > > > > > Best regards > > > Cancai Cai > > > > > > link： > > > > > > > > > https://streampark.apache.org/community/submit_guide/code_style_and_quality_guide/ > > > > > >
