Apache family. Specifically to avoid issues like the json thing in the other thread. On Nov 23, 2016 12:40 PM, "Suneel Marthi" <smar...@apache.org> wrote:
> "keeping it in the family" - explain Family here? > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Knowing nothing about Reactive streams, and already voicing my opinions > > about beam on this thread, I'd rather see Apache Beam be used if for no > > other reason than "keeping it in the family", e.g. less worry about > > managing dependency licenses, etc, etc. > > > > Tg > > Resident neigh-sayer of the thread > > On Nov 23, 2016 11:25 AM, "Timothy Spann" <tsp...@hortonworks.com> > wrote: > > > > > Reactive Streams is very cool, but only used by a few frameworks. > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactive_Streams > > > > > > Its adoption is slow, but starting to grow. I’ve worked with RxJava > and > > > Project Reactor. Once Spring 5 is out for a bit, then it will > probably > > > time to look at the Reactive Streams API. > > > > > > > > >
