We're using the same "immutable" release scheme used by Apache HTTPD and Jakarta 
Tomcat.

A release is rolled and assigned a number. If we judge the release good, it is 
promoted from alpha to beta to General Release. The release number never changes, only 
the rating we assign to it.

1.2.0 never made it past alpha.

I think 1.2.1 may fare better.

-Ted.

On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:03:03 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Is 1.2.1 just releasing as Beta?
>
>
> Also, what happened to 1.2.0?!
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> David
>
>
> |---------+---------------------------->
> |         |           Ted Husted       |
> |         |           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
> |         |           g>               |
> |         |                            |
> |         |           04/04/2004 09:14 |
> |         |           PM               |
> |         |           Please respond to|
> |         |           "Struts          |
> |         |           Developers List" |
> |         |                            |
> |---------+---------------------------->
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------------|
> |
>                                             |
> |       To:       Struts Developers List <struts-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                        |
> |       cc:
>                                             |
> |       Subject:  2.3 for 1.3? (was Counting down to 1.2.1)
>                                             |
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------------|
>
>
> So, I'm going to knuckle down and do whatever we need to do to get
> 1.2.1 ready to cut this week.
>
> In the meantime, I'm wondering if we want to just bite the bullet
> and move the minimum to servlet 2.3 for the Struts 1.3.x series?
>
> People using 2.2 can still use 1.2.x, and having 2.3 available
> might simplify some of the configuration discussions we're having
> now.
>
> Struts 2.0 is being slated for 2.4, so it's a clean continuum.
>
>
> As to the subproject reorg, I'd imagine we'd still keep taglib-
> classic on 2.2, and taglib-jstl and taglib-faces on 2.3.
>
> -Ted.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to