On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:39:44 -0700, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:28:29 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:47:56 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > When we first started discussing changes to the way we build and > > > release Struts, the model that was proposed was the Tomcat model, > > > and that is still the model I would like to see us follow, > > > terminology and all. > > > > I believe the initial suggestion, way back when, was to use the HTTPD protocol, > > which people then mentioned was like the Tomcat protocol. > > > > I don't believe that's correct. Craig brought up the topic, from his > experience with Tomcat, and specifically suggested that we do things > the way Tomcat was doing them.
I did indeed propose the Tomcat model, or at least the Tomcat model that I understood to be working at the time. More recently, it looks like there's an informal step of tacit agreement on the dev list that a new release should be created, with an implicit alpha quality rating. I don't care if we go with implicit alpha ratings versus no rating at all -- indeed that probably makes more sense. I do care if, for example, I can go create a "Struts-Faces Integration Library 1.0.1" release (even if it's labelled as alpha quality) with zero input from the other committers. That doesn't seem like something we want to encourage. > > -- > Martin Cooper Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
