On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 15:26:45 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a perfect world... > > svn.apache.org/asf/struts > /core > /trunk > /branches > /tags > /faces > /trunk > /branches > /tags > /bsf > /trunk > /branches > /tags > /flow > /trunk > /branches > /tags > > Therefore, we would then instruct folks that want to work on Struts core > to use http://svn.apache.org/asf/struts/core/trunk >
I like that ... the basic principle would be that each separately releasable artifact would have it's own top-level structure with trunk, branches, and tags underneath. We'll likely factor "core" into separately releasable artifacts later, but this makes a great start. Only one minor question ... do we care about distinguishing proposals (like shale or jericho) versus things that are accepted parts of Struts, or is that just an issue of whether we ever actually release something or not? I'm ok either way. > Don Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
