Yep, that's a lot of what I had in mind. But I had been thinking that there was call for some more functionality in the controller layers as well as in the view. The interface is read-only, which is right for a view, but maybe incomplete in other layers.

But I'm ready for bed now, so I will have to sleep on it before I could say just what "write" type methods I think there would need to be.

Joe


At 11:16 PM -0500 11/30/04, Ted Husted wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:15:51 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote:
ÝI've been thinking for a while that we should stop storing so many
Ýthings directly in the ServletContext and instead, define a
Ý"Struts" object which would hold these things. ÝI've mentioned this
Ýobliquely a few times and not gotten much response, so maybe no one
Ýelse likes the idea. ÝOr maybe it's been too oblique. ÝBenefits of
Ýsomething like this would be reducing dependencies on the Servlet
ÝAPI and providing a better environment for testing.

Like it? I implemented it two years nine months ago :)

* http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/struts/trunk/src/share/org/apache/struts/config/ConfigHelperInterface.java?rev=48889&view=markup

It's also mentioned on the proposed updates to the Roadmap.

* http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=29427

under the moniker "ViewContext".

I was going to try and work on updating the website tonight, but my flight was delayed, and I might not get to it.

I do think we should be passing a Struts API bean out to the view, which could also include a context for arbitrary properties.

-Ted.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
Joe Germuska
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blog.germuska.com
"Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction"  -The Ex

Reply via email to