On Mon, February 14, 2005 12:42 pm, Don Brown said: > I agree...in theory. In reality, as Hubert pointed out, the type of the > property might be integeter, and say the user entered, "one". When > validation fails, you want to display the value the user entered, and > without the dynabean layer, you can't do that. JSF and Tapestry solve > this problem by having the original value stored in the component, then > when its validation succeeds, it is set on the backing bean.
Ah, gotcha! :) Yep, I see the problem. There's some contribed ways I could think of to get around this without needing to create the form bean, but it starts to look suspiciously like a lot of extra work, which is of course what my concern was to begin with, so what you propose makes sense :) > Don Frank --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
