I really understand your pain, Frank. I don't understand why Ted thinks this is not a central problem or why it is okay for one action to process and another action to setup but not okay for one action to do both. I do think that somehow combining setup and processing is crucial. We all have to do it with hacks at the present, so far as I can see. I welcome your contribution on the new wiki page in tandem with the presentation you have already made.
Jack On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:23:49 -0500 (EST), Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, March 17, 2005 12:56 pm, Dakota Jack said: > > This means that you EITHER have to use two actions, leading to all the > > nonsense of chaining actions (why do you think that is recurrent, > > Ted?), OR you have to make PAGE-A the same as PAGE-B, which you can > > only do for so long unless you want to emulate Portlets, OR you have > > to have the same ActionForm for BOTH PAGE-A AND PAGE-B. > > Or you can use setupItems! > > (Did anyone *not* see that coming?!?) > > And yes, before anyone says it, 1.3 solves this problem in a different way :) > > -- > Frank W. Zammetti > Founder and Chief Software Architect > Omnytex Technologies > http://www.omnytex.com > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
