Just as a point of personal preference, it seems like removing massive feature sets from a 1.x.x release is a little misleading. But I don't use any of those libraries in a production app, so I can't say it wouldn't really impact me. Michael
On 5/4/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The last "ga" Struts release (i.e. version 1.2.4) was done from CVS and the > contents of the "contrib" folder were shipped in the source distribution. > Since then we have moved to SVN and re-organised the repository and the only > thing now included in the 1.2.x source distribution are the "el tags". > > Since I haven't used anything from "contrib" I'm pretty neutral about > including any of it, but given that some people may have done, do we want to > include any or all of the things that we previously shipped? > > Struts 1.2.4 included the following in "contrib" (as well as Struts-el) > > /artimus > /scaffold > /struts-chain > /struts-faces > /struts-jericho > /tag-doc > /workflow > > For "el" I believe James did something "smart" in SVN so that when the > STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH is checked out it includes the "el" sub-project's > STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH - we would probably want something similar for any of the > remainder that we want to include? > > I know some people have built stuff around struts-chain - so I think there > is a case for including that - from the sandbox STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH - > anything else? > > Niall > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
