I agree as well. Hubert
On 5/26/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would also vote for "org.apache.tiles" - my guess it would be more > > platable to other frameworks if there isn't a "struts" in the name. It might > > make people think there was a struts dependency with "struts" in the package > > name. Also, if the consensus is to move out as a TLP in the future, then > > there wouldn't be a need to change package names at that point. > > Excellent points. I agree with that reasoning. > > sean > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
