It might be worthwhile to add your review (below) to the wiki page http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsBook I, for one, was put off by the language errors and general incomplete feeling of the document, but your comments would lead me to give it a closer look.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 1:08 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Cc: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsBook" by > GeorgeDinwiddie > > > On Tue, November 15, 2005 12:53 pm, Martin Cooper said: > > Very strange. The title says Struts Ti, but that is the > only place in > > the entire book that Ti is mentioned. > > I thought that was odd too :) > > I have to say, I spent about 10 minutes looking over this > thing, and overall I thought it was quite good. Sure, there > are some debatable points in there, some things that some > might argue aren't "best practices", and there are some > mistakes like you've pointed out (no more than most books > that get published today I'd bet), but it looks to do a good > job of covering a lot of topics in a decent way. I've > actually passed a copy along to some colleagues that are just > getting into the J2EE web development world now... I think if > they read and understand even half of this it will serve them > down the road. > > > My > > favourite, though, is page 3, where is says "This book > should be used > > by". (That's the entire sentence.) > > Hey, that's flexibility man! :) > > Frank > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
