On 12/1/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we add the "TBD" milestone, I encourage everyone to only add tickets to it > if > it is a clear, reachable goal that we want to achieve. While I'm afraid it > will > attract stagnant tickets no one cares about, I understand some folks find it > useful, and I'm usually wrong anyways :)
Maybe we can agree that if a ticket has had no progress for 12 or 18 or 24 mos, it should be reviewed and possibly marked WONTFIX / INVALID. > Next, I see the following steps: > > Step 2: > - Move closed tickets included in soon-to-be-released projects to their > milestone. > - Wade through TBD tickets and assign to milestones > > While I like Martin's idea of only putting tickets to milestones when someone > commits to resolving them <snip/> I thought this was your idea? (#3 on your initial proposal) http://www.nabble.com/-PROPOSAL-Target-tickets-to-milestones-and-use-as-roadmap-p1711361.html > Perhaps we could start > using the "Assigned" field more often to mark which ones have been taken up > and > which are just hanging. ...or the combination of "Assigned" and a milestone means that committer plans to resolve the ticket for the specified milestone. Hubert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
