At 11:19 PM -0700 12/2/05, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 12/2/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In short, it builds a JAR with a timestamped version (like
struts-core-20051106.203359.jar) and then makes a copy of it with the
name struts-core-SNAPSHOT.jar So for my team, if we are depending on
a nightly build, we use the timestamped version, not the SNAPSHOT, so
that there is no inconsistency.
(The artifact plugin was finally convinced to cooperate.) Before I
deleted them, http://cvs.apache.org/repository/tiles/jars/ had:
tiles-core-0.2-20051203.055551.jar 02-Dec-2005 21:56 82K
tiles-core-0.2-20051203.060733.jar 02-Dec-2005 22:07 82K
tiles-core-0.2-SNAPSHOT.jar 02-Dec-2005 22:07 82K
tiles-core-SNAPSHOT.jar 30-Aug-2005 21:27 106K
(plus all the signatures and metadata)
A Joe explained, you can declare a dependency on a particular snapshot
and not have to worry about Maven retrieving the latest version.
do we want to remove tiles-core-SNAPSHOT.jar ? I'm afraid there
might be confusion; from the listing details, it's clearly not the
same as the other files (is that 24K the result of Greg's aggressive
pruning? Nice work! ;-) )
I think we should disclaim any responsibility for maintaining
specific JARs in the cvs.apache.org repository; if people are
depending on SNAPSHOTS, they should be prepared for things possibly
being removed. Is that fair?
Joe
--
Joe Germuska
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blog.germuska.com
"Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction" -The Ex
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
