On 1/10/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/10/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't see a point to build fences between two versions of > > (presumably) the same framework. This will slow down the adoption of > > 2.0/WW/Ti . > > There has to be _some_ way to separate the questions, otherwise every > answer is going to start with, "What version of which framework are > you using?" (Or just be entirely wrong...)
Before posting questions every mailing list subscriber is supposed to read the http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html recommendations. In particular, it reads: "Describe the environment in which it occurs (machine, OS, application, whatever). Provide your vendor's distribution and release level (e.g.: "Fedora Core 4", "Slackware 9.1", etc.)." So this kind of sorting out the questions will happen automatically. The questions formed impoperly will likely remain unanswered. I don't see how this can be harmful ;-) It will encourage people to look in wiki/archives first or to rephrase the question better. Michael. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
