DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38343>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38343 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-07 19:30 ------- >> Hopefully Paul will provide more constructive feedback to my suggestion. This is asking too much perhaps :-) But I will do my best. >> What about the dispatcher using reflection to find methods (with correct signature) automatically. This is a very good idea. But my focus of this class does not want to address refelction because one of the problems with the original tired-and-true DispatchAction is that you cannot limit which methods, for a particular action mapping, you want to invoke. This is one need I was addressing with this design. It is important for me, as a Struts developer, to prevent people from toying around with the request and try to invoke methods outside the flow of my defined intent. >> Configure in the Action's constructor as in my previous example? This idea is novel and has not crossed my mind. Thank you for recommending it. I don't know what to make of it yet because I am not interested in configuring the class, as I am configuring a mapping. I have my configuration in the config file because, well, that's "how it's always been done" .... but seriously, I want the freedom to configure per action mapping. I believe my previous comments speak to this. Niall, do you find yourself with a need to configure an action on a per-class basis? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
