On 3/21/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And I didn't mean to discourage you -- in fact I offered to help. :) > My comment was qualified with 'from a release manager perspective'. > Obviously, it's easier to package and verify a release for a single > jar than several of them plus example apps. > > If anyone really wanted to keep the separate sub-projects, I think > they would have spoken up by now. Somehow I don't think you're going > to get any opposition, and now that the proposal is on the table, I'd > like to see a decision made one way or the other.
I think the important thing is that we not halt any forward progress. If someone wants to move forward with another build of one or more of the Action 1 subprojects, then I would suggest staying the course and rolling the build. If no one is eager to start moving things about, I'd suggest an optimum time to recombine the subprojects would be after each had a GA release. At least then we would have something out the door, where more teams could use it. A GA release orf each would also demonstrate an ongoing need to move things about. But, again, AFAIC, whoever is ready to do the work is welcome to make the decision. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
