DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39040>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39040 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-25 21:55 ------- Actually, it just seems to me like Struts shouldn't acknowledge any more awareness of the Servlet API than absolutely necessary. This would help use with portlets, but may also make testing easier. I'm looking into this some more and here's the rough outline: a "StrutsConfigurator" interface that has two methods: public void initialize(Map application); public void destroy(Map application); then the ServletContextListener class would make a configurator and wrap the servlet context in a map and pass it to the configurator. I suppose somehow I'll also have to pass in information about where the config files are... Is there any objection to me wholesale lifting com.opensymphony.webwork.dispatcher.ApplicationMap to perform the ServletContext-to-Map adaptation? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
