Sorry if this was taken wrong... I am all for Action 2, so I voted for org.apache.struts.action2 and that is still my favourite for the package name...
So I am +1 with Don & Paul as well... -- Rainer > > I agree with Don and Paul. The webwork as dear to us as it may be should > be excised. > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> > Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 3:55:50 PM > Subject: Re: WebWork renaming strategy *revised* > > I am +1 with Don. If this community wants the name webwork, then I believe > this > incubation shouldn't become Struts 2.0 -- because names are > well-established out > there and it's awkward to say it's Struts although the packages are > webwork; > you might as well just make it Apache WebWork and allow Action 2.0 to come > from > another source base... but I don't think anyone wants to seriously do that > ;) > The ball is rolling, so I recommend to "excise" the name WW from the > product > (in favor of "action2") unless you want to call it WW 2.3. -- Paul > > --- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If we used the 'webwork' name in the package, I think we should abandon >> the idea of this being >> the second major version >> of Action. In my opinion, a project needs to have a name, a single >> name, which one uses to >> identify it. If we want to >> bring WebWork in as a new Struts subproject, and that is an option, then >> I'm fine with that. >> However, I'm not OK with >> mixing webwork in with Action in with Struts. We need to make a >> decision, then move on. >> >> Don >> >> Niall Pemberton wrote: >> > +1 to webwork - "org.apache.webwork" if thats allowed, otherwise >> > "org.apache.struts.webwork". >> > >> > Niall >> > >> > On 3/27/06, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hey there, >> >> >> >> if webwork is an option as well, I would vote for org.apache.webwork >> :) >> >> >> >> The tag prefix ui: won't be my choice... There are plenty of non-ui >> tags >> >> within webwork. So this would result in something like: ui:/nonui: >> and >> >> this would be quite annoying for me... >> >> Same with html: prefix... Yes, some are html tags, but others are >> not... >> >> >> >> So we would have to go the logic:, bean: and html: route... >> >> Too much confusion... >> >> >> >> Still my favourites are saf: or a: (and being sometimes lazy, ww: of >> >> course :) ) >> >> >> >> cheers, >> >> Rainer >> >> >> >> PS: Can't we decide on this later if there is no consens now? >> >> Since this is a simple refactoring with subversion it should not hold >> up >> >> the incubation process for now... >> >> >> >>>> - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.action2 >> >>>> - WebWork* classes -> Struts* >> >>>> - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts Action 2 >> >>>> - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> struts. >> >>>> - ww: tag prefix -> a:/saf: >> >>> +1 >> >>> >> >>> I would also be +1 to: >> >>> - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.webwork or >> >>> org.apache.webwork >> >>> - ww: tag prefix -> ui: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> James Mitchell >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Mar 25, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Ted Husted wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> STATUS so far >> >>>> >> >>>> - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.ti >> >>>> - WebWork* classes -> Struts* >> >>>> - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts Action 2 >> >>>> - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> struts. >> >>>> - ww: tag prefix -> a: >> >>>> >> >>>> +1 Don Brown, Martin Cooper (binding) >> >>>> +1 Frank Zammetti (non-binding) >> >>>> >> >>>> - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.action2 >> >>>> - WebWork* classes -> Struts* >> >>>> - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts Action 2 >> >>>> - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> struts. >> >>>> - ww: tag prefix -> a:/saf: >> >>>> >> >>>> +1 Rainer Hermanns, Ted Husted, Alexandru Popescu, Rene Gielen >> >>>> (binding) >> >>>> +0 Toby Jee, Hubert Rabago (binding) >> >>>> +1 Paul Benedict (non-binding) >> >>>> >> >>>> If I've left any votes out, or gotten any of the votes wrong, be >> sure >> >>>> to chime in! >> >>>> >> >>>> -Ted. >> >>>> >> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
