+1 to your +1
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 19, 2006, at 3:10 PM, Don Brown wrote:
Bob Lee wrote:
I vote for "struts-action.xml".
+1
Don
Bob
On 4/19/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We might want to keep a straight-line mapping in the naming
conventions, where
OpenSymphony -> Apache Struts
WebWork -> Action
A good reason to prefer "action-default.xml" to "struts-default.xml"
is that we want people to be able to use Struts Action 1 and Struts
Action 2 in the same application space. We already have a
"struts-config.xml". While these file names don't actually conflict,
it might be clearer to name the new configurations "action" rather
than "struts" to avoid confusion.
So, I would suggest that we use "action-default.xml", and any place
where we've started to say "struts", we might consider saying
"action", so as to avoid confusion and conflict with Struts
Action 1.
-Ted.
On 4/19/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patrick Lightbody wrote:
We can definitely start by reading "struts.xml" rather than
"xwork.xml".
+1, works great with struts-default.xml
Don
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
