Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
However, if I were to come up with one now, I would say it is simply to help ensure that Action1 does not die, and more than that, is allowed to evolve. I know it isn't going away, I know support isn't being dropped, I know all that. I also know that Ted has said he intends to follow through on the roadmap. I applaude him for that. Do the other committers share that conviction? If so, then your right, this is nothing but an issue of perception. The way to fix that, as others have said recently, is simply to communicate plans better. That should do the trick. If no one shares Ted's goals though, and there are other non-committers that do, let them in to help Ted :)
But they can help Ted without being committers. And when Ted gets annoyed with constantly applying their patches then he will nominate them. I've seen it happen. I can think of at least a few times when nominations were still public that they were accompanied with a "I nominate so and so because their patches are of high quality and I'm tired of committing them." type of message. :)
-Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
