On 5/6/06, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The new API should be simpler, cleaner, better separated from the
implementation, more intuitive, and better organized. If you
understand WW2, you'll have no problem understanding the new API. If
you haven't learned WW2 yet, it will be easier to learn the new API
than WW2.

All of which seems to imply that the "new API" might be the equivalent of WW 3.

We've always planned to consider signficant API changes for "SAF 2.0
Next" as Ti Phase 2, but we need to set modest, achievable
expectations for SAF 2.0 (aka WW 2.3). The first phase is an
evolutionary transition. The second phase is meant to be
revolutionary.

Of course, without code on the table, it's too soon to say yes, no, or
maybe. No matter what anyone plans to do, the implementation has to
pass muster. The most anyone here can say is "Looks cool, show us the
code" or "Here's the code, how do you like it?".

-Ted.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to