Ok, that's no problem. Waiting might be better, especially since it
looks like at least some of it involves rule tweaking, and hence I'd
think some discussion. I don't want to do anything that makes getting
to GA more difficult, so I'm ok with coming back to it later.
Frank
Ted Husted wrote:
On 6/13/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ted... I wouldn't say there's no one interested in fixing the errors
:) I offered to do it some time ago, and I'm still willing (and my time
has freed up again, so able as well!)
Unforutnately, it seems to be a timing issue. If the patches had been
available back in February when we trimmed the checkstyle issues from
tens of thousands to thousands, I would have been able to apply them.
Right now, Wendy has been publishing 1.3.5 snapshots, and she may be
ready for another try at a release. I don't know if we want to get
into this again now or after we have a GA 1.3.
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM: fzammetti
Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Java Web Parts -
http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net
Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
