I'm not sure how easy it would be to change the license, but that really shouldn't be necessary. As you say it is just a build tool so there is no need to distribute the source, or even have the source checked in. I did a few quick searches and found:
"ASF projects can use GPL/LGPL code during the build process so long as there is no runtime dependency in the code produced." Link here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-general&m=104459003800562&w=2 I'm sure you could find a bunch of existing examples. Let me know if you have any technical problems getting jarjar to work. >From what I understand it does seem like a quick solution to your problem. Chris On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:05:51 -0700, Bob Lee wrote: > It's a tool though, so it won't be distrubuted. If it's a big issue, > I'm sure we can talk Chris into something. Chris? > > On 6/13/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Very tempting if it wasn't GPL :( >> >> Bob Lee wrote: >> > We should use jarjar: http://tonicsystems.com/products/jarjar/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]