On Jun 14, 2006, at 2:09 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Greg Reddin ha scritto:
Of the attributes that are currently supported by InsertTag, I
believe the following are redundant:
1) attribute, definition, name could all be resolved to name.
...
In addition the name attribute can be interpreted as either a
pointer to a Tiles definition or attribute or an URL, which
essentially makes it equivalent to page and template.
Only a little problem: what if there is a definition that has the
same name of an attribute? Will it get the attribute or the
definition?
I think this is pretty rare, but I think also that it needs attention.
Maybe an optional "type" attribute could be used to distinguish
between attribute and name, and when it is absent the tag gives
precedence to the attribute.
Good call. I'll make sure that gets included.
Greg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
