+1 -- Everything looks great.
--
James Mitchell
On Jun 16, 2006, at 9:58 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 6/16/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/16/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think It's now to the point where I'd like to make
> this the trunk, and get back to fixing bugs and implementing
RFEs. What
say
> ye? If there's no objections, my plan is to copy the current
trunk to a
> "pre-maven" branch as is, then copy the "mvn_reorg" to the regular
trunk.
> I'd like to do this by tomorrow (Saturday June 17) evening, Pacific
time, so
> we can start addressing the backlog of issues.
+1 on the general idea, but I would just:
svn mv shale/trunk shale/tags/SHALE_PRE_MAVEN2
svn mv shale/branches/mvn_reorg shale/trunk
(Done remotely, as no one is likely to have all the tags and branches
checked out.)
That's pretty much what I had in mind, except
"shale/branches/SHALE_PRE_MAVEN2". The thinking was that we might
still
have to update the website out of the old tree, until all the
wrinkles are
ironed out in the new tree.
As for "branches" versus "tags", that is basically just a
convention anyway
... Subversion treats them identically.
I don't think we need either a branch for the pre-Maven code (just a
tag) or to keep a copy of what is now mvn_reorg in branches. Maybe
there were some implied "deletes" in your original plan. :)
Agree that we don't need to keep any separate copy of the "mvn_reorg"
branch.
--
Wendy
Craig
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]