> Instead these components would fall into an "extra" project, separate > from the core project.
Is it possible to have it remain in core, I am willing to maintain and improve them. About using dwr as the officianl ajax tool / util, i am not sure how components could be build around it. Would it be too much efford to build components around dwr or are we looking on something else. (I have almost no knowledge about dwr :-P so i might be totally off ) regards. ----- Original Message ---- From: Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> Sent: Monday, 19 June, 2006 8:52:45 PM Subject: Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit My understanding from the meeting was that we would not pursue components that simply wrapped other components (i.e. dojo widgets). Instead these components would fall into an "extra" project, separate from the core project. /Ian tm jee wrote: > Hmm.... what about the ajax component support? Are we going to make them > work with dwr instead of dojo? or just dropping them > > rgds > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> > Sent: Sunday, 18 June, 2006 11:22:26 PM > Subject: Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit > > At JavaOne it was decided to go with DWR in favour of dojo. Given this > I would assume that we would not upgrade the version. > > /Ian > > > tm jee wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> Is there any plan to upgrade dojotoolkit from the current 0.2.2 to 0.3.x? >> >> 0.3.x have lots of really cool stuff and from the bugs list, it looks like >> lots of bugs have been fixed. >> >> Cheers. >> >> >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
