Ted, as I was afraid, you are unfortunately, interpretting wrongly my message. RoR is not about dumb-distro, nor my intention/hope to have something very simple in the Java world.
As for we can built different distributions and things like this: I would definitely try to be objective: we are doing this for fun, so why do you think I would like to make my life more complex? :-). I think I've exposed my thoughts. From now on, I will listen the majority. BR, ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. --- (http://themindstorms.blogspot.com) On 6/21/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/21/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you think this can be done with the big-package-solves-everything > approach, than I am oke with it. Hmmm, you can have both. If people are interested in RoR simplicity, then why not create an Action-on-Rails distribution that configures the framework to support one clearly-defined approach to web development. The AoR distribution might only support one AJAX theme, and one view technology. The distribution could also be bundled with a particular data access technology, so that it would be the complete package. Eventually, you could also bundle AoR with tweaked version of Rainbow, Geronimo, Derby, and Eclipse, and have a single-stop-shop. But, we don't need to dumb-down SAF2 to do that. We just need people to document favorite ways of configuring SAF2, bundling it up as a distribution, and then be willing to support the configuration. Now, what if we want to have an Action-on-JSF distribution? What else do we need to do to SAF2 so that it supports JSF as well as it supports JSP and FreeMarkerr? -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
