I chose 1.x and 2.0 because I think it fits better with the other archived web
sites. The struts1 and struts2 names are more for internal use and in
particular, struts1 is only used in svn due to the maven workaround. I think
1.x and 2.0, as well as the past 1.2.9 and so on, is easier for the user to
"guess" and remember.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
On 7/1/06, Don Brown (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rename Struts Action 1 to Struts 1
If we are using "struts1" and "struts2" for the repository folders
(which is fine with me), why are we using "1.x" and "2.0" for the
website folders?
* http://struts.apache.org/1.x/
* http://struts.apache.org/2.0/
In the view of "convention over configuration", I feel we we should
work toward using a consistent set of conventions across tools. If
there is not a technical reason why we need to use symbols, I'd like
to use "struts1" and "struts2" for the website folders.
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
