I can do some more Checkstyle work over the next few days... when do you (or whoever is going to do it) plan to role the release? I absolutely doubt I can get them all taken care of by then, whenever then actually is, but I should be able to cut through another sizable chunk of them.
Wendy, your going to check them in, correct? I'd like to grab everything anew to be sure I'm fully up-to-date. Also, what problem did you find with the patches, so maybe I can avoid them next time? Frank -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com AIM: fzammetti Yahoo: fzammetti MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it! On Tue, July 11, 2006 4:31 pm, Ted Husted wrote: > First, I want to say that the Struts 1.3.5 assembly is a marvel of > Maven engineering. > > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.x/assembly/ > > It's all there, simple as pie. > > /docs > /lib > /src > /webapps > NOTICE.txt > LICENSE.txt > > My only question is: Does size matter? > > Zipped, the 1.3.5 snapshot is 40.8mb. > > Zipped, the individual components come to > > docs.zip - 11.5mb > lib.zip - 2.8mb > src.zip - 5.8mb > webapps - 20.5mb > > Do we want to offer these archives separately, in addition to the > combined snapshot? > > I'm not suggesting that we fuss with the build right now. I can just > zip these up by hand from the big snapshot and drop in the NOTICE.txt > and LICENSE.txt files. > > Thoughts? > > Meanwhile, offhand, does anyone know why the 1.3.5 distribution has > doubled in byteage? > > The comparable numbers for 1.2.9 seem to be > > combined assembly, 22mb > docs, 2.1mb > lib, 1.3mb > src, 8.2mb > webapps, 10.1mb > > I could dig a bit more, but wanted to check with the group first. > > (Or, as Jason says, it's just that 1.3.5 is twice as good!) > > -Ted. > > PS: There's still a bit to do with Checkstyle patches, sorting out > "embedded" Tiles, and doing some type of documentation for the apps, > but we are very close to tagging and rolling. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
